CTV News Shows Signs of Advancing on Global, by Harvey Oberfeld

5

by Harvey Oberfeld

Keeping It Real…

May 29 2023

TV ratings in the US are an open book … published regularly for all to see. Not so in Canada, where broadcasters guard their viewership numbers from all but a very select few.

But the Blog has obtained stat pages covering FOUR separate days of TV News program ratings in April and May in Toronto, Edmonton and Vancouver … with some fascinating details, especially for my BC readers.

And it sure looks to me like Global Vancouver News’ transition to too many soft stories, too much government-messenger-like rather than tough political reporting/questioning and too frequent fawning promotional Chinese/East Indian/First Nations “community” pieces …more propaganda than real news … have cost them viewers!

And apparently sending many to CTV.

Remember that, for decades, BCTV’s Newshour regularly outdrew its closest competitor (CTV) with five and six times the number of viewers.

That worked out regularly to 500,000 to 650,000 nightly viewers BC-wide … and TV ratings points of 5.5 to 6.5 … sometimes even higher … while CTV languished around 1 rating point, and CBC at 6 p.m. barely registered on the scale!

(For those interested in technical definitions “Ratings point is a measure of viewership of a particular television programme. One single television ratings point (Rtg or TVR) represents 1% of television households in the surveyed area in a given minute.” Wikipedia)

Those numbers … and the huge gap between BCTV and CTV … was not only great for our egos when I spent 26 years at BCTV, its was very, very good for management, advertisers and station $$$$!

But today, ratings are down, way down from BCTV’s peak, due to the wider variety of channels, so many other media sources etc. … and also, I contend, a DECLINE in the quality of what Global, the successor to BCTV, offers its viewers!

While CTV is doing better.

On May 5, Global scored it’s current “normal” ratings point score of 2.1, but interestingly, CTV was UP … to 1.6 ratings points, closing the formerly double, quadruple or quintuple gap between the two stations significantly.

An anomaly? That could be one way to spin it … except there were also “anomalies” in April, according to the docs I obtained. (And who knows how many other “anomalies” occurred in other days/weeks/months?)

In fact, on April 19, Global Newshour captured 2.7 ratings points, while CTV News at Six scored 1.4; on April 11, Global 2.9; CTV 1.5; and, on April 10, Global 2.9; CTV 1.8 … narrowing the gap.

More anomalies?

On those same dates, CTV 5 p.m. News BEAT Global’s ratings on ALL four occasions: May 5, CTV 1.3, Global 0.3; April 19, CTV 1.7, Global 0.6; April 11, CTV 0.7, Global 0.4; and April 10, CTV 1.3, Global 0.4. Wow!!

And for the Late News, it’s now almost a draw! May 5, CTV 1.3, Global 1.1; April 19, Global 1.3, CTV 1.0; April 11, Global 1.7, CTV 1.3; and April 10, Global 1.6, CTV 1.3.

CTV seems to be closing the gap with Global in BC … something unheard of for decades!

(If Global has more extensive data and would like to make it available to my readers, I’m sure we’d all be happy to see it.)

However, based on these daily readouts, I feel somewhat vindicated.

Readers of this Blog will be well aware of my rants about the decline at my once-mighty alma mater when it comes to hiring standards (ethnicity seems more important than journalistic skills, experience), resulting in my view lower reporting quality, poorer writing quality, almost non-existent tough questioning or hard challenging of those in power, even when they make gaffes or fail to deliver what they promised.

And doing too much with too little is also evident, I believe, in the lesser quality of their video shooting and editing possibilities that used to be so enjoyable for viewers to watch.

The station has lost its edge … the hook that captured hundreds of thousands more loyal nightly viewers when it was BCTV!

I’m glad they don’t call it BCTV anymore. May it Rest in Peace.

CTV News also has some distance to go journalistically, especially in political coverage and its questioning too, but have to admit I’m sometimes happily surprised when I tune in to at least see some interesting stories there that I had not already heard all day long on the radio!

If these figures over four days are indeed an indication of what is happening, clearly Global viewers have also noticed what I have … and are moving away.

You have to wonder if Global management … both local and senior management (back East) … have noticed what has been happening, have been oblivious to it … or are responsible for it, which is even worse.

Harv Oberfeld

5 COMMENTS

  1. Sorry, ‘fawning’ politically-correct stories is absolutely right on Harv. Throw in the childish giggle fest between stories, and I’ll see ya later. Long ago tuned out the local TV news, and never to return. I get a lot more content and texture elsewhere.

  2. Very interesting, Harvey. The only reason to watch is to view the contributions of people such Mike Campbell, Keith Baldrey, and Squire Barnes.

    Sophie Lui has some gravitas, however, the presenters on the CBC are chosen more for their ethnicity than for their substance and skills in English.

    Radio-Canada is a real surprise. Ethnic presenters who speak excellent French.

  3. Harvey: the news media also (sadly) kills people, including its own (Debora Hope). It’s such a nasty business where “whitey” once ruled, everywhere, and the brown-skinned folk had no hope in hell of cracking the once mighty BCTV lineup, which was noticeable lacking of blacks and Asians, save for Jas Johal and Mi Jung Lee. At least there is some diversity, now ? If you want to see some journalistic “heavy hitting,” switch the set to CBC and watch Ian Hanomansing in action.

  4. Oh, and Harv…with today’s multi-platform choices, I don’t think anyone cares about the state of local TV news. If these private companies want to drive it into the ground, the only people who should care are the shareholders.

  5. I just came across this article, I know it’s been over a year since it was written, but I still agree completely.The reporters don’t ask the tough questions, and a lot of the time the story is flawed because they don’t get all the sides of the story.Plus they repeat the same stories for days without adding anything new.Why do we need a reporter to be on site to repeat what the anchor just said or what a spokesperson for the police just said? Poor use of reporters, who ever the news director is should be fired.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here